what executive needed for region

Here is thread to present and discuss Ideas of regional governance. That is, how decisions affecting region or citizens of region should be formed and who shall execute these decision. Example is establishing diplomatic relations with other regions.
Thank you.

Well, in the past this has been the domain of the delegate, which was elected. However, it has been pointed out that a frequent turnover in delegates can invite invasions, so I think we should minimize the importance of the delegate in regional affairs. While not a big fan of a unitary executive with broad powers, it seems to me that a single elected official would be best given the size of the region. We could term limit this executive to ensure no nation dominates regional affairs in perpetuity.

Might be better to have councils or committees with limited powers, for example one to propose, accept or establish diplomatic relations with other regions, or another to judge behavior of citizens and censure or reward them.
Such council or committee members could be elected to staggered terms to allow participation of all citizens and to allow change in practice with continuity. This would also help in situation where one council member's participation is limited by RL.

There would then be more offices for citizens allowing greater participation and direction would map to views of most citizens, not one executive.

Unitary executive only necessary where quick action required. For region, this is primarily protection from invasion, which is power of WA Delegate.